1. ManEx Minute - 34 - Outsource Management
Keep me out of SPAM!  Please add newsletter@manex.com to safe senders list.
 


INSPIRATIONS
"Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch it to be sure."



-Murphey's Law



Subscribe to ManEx Minute

 
 
 
April, 2010
Issue 34
Dear David,  

Thank you for your interest in the ManEx SQL introduction webinars.  We are just as anxious as you to see it progress and finish.  We had enough response to warrant multiple meetings.  We plan to conduct 30 minute sessions to reduce the impact on your daily activities. 

The first meeting will cover system setup and will show the screens and highlight the differences between ManEx SQL and the current version.  We will hold this meeting twice, first on 4/16 and again on 4/23 at 9am Mountain.  Seating is limited and is first come first serve.  Please let me know which you would like to attend so I can provide the connection information.

As if that wasn't great enough news, we have even better news!  Business is finally getting back to normal.  Not only are our customers seeing an increase in business, but we have been very busy with presentations and demos.  It is wonderful to see demand getting back on track.  We aren't all the way back just yet, but all signs point in the right direction.  We hope that each of you are experiencing this increase and return.

Either way, we want to help in any way we can.  If you have a challenge and want help, please take a moment to let us know and see if others can help you work through it.

As always, we look forward to your participation and feedback as you gain new insights and become a more effective provider of Electronic Manufacturing Services.

Sincerely,

David Sharp
ManEx, Inc.
FEATUREBusiness Case - Production Control
Outsource Management

North Eastern Company (NE Company)* has the need to outsource processing of specific raw parts to other vendors for final modifications that they cannot do internally.  They have been doing this outside their system, but are finding it more and more difficult to maintain.

One example is a raw metal enclosure.  The manufacturer will not do custom modifications to the enclosure unless minimum volumes are met.  Therefore, NE Company outsources drilling, painting, silk screening, etc. to a local machine shop.

To keep their customer exposure to a minimum, they do not outsource more than is needed to meet current customer demand.  This means they have the raw metal enclosure in stock as well as some already processed finished enclosures.  They need to track the quantity on hand for each variation of the part as well as the added costs associated with the modified components.

How can NE Company structure this in their system to accurately track quantities at each stage in the process?  How do they automatically notify purchasing to place a PO for processing the raw parts?  How does the stock room know to pull the raw parts and send them for outsourcing?  What impact will that have on the overall cost of the finished assembly?

*Name has been changed


MCSBusiness Case Solution


Even outsourcing companies sometimes need to outsource. This can be a cost effective way to complete a job when they do not have the resources or capabilities in-house. However, three main actions are needed in order for it to work:

Read the full Business Case Solution >>


MCSManEx Case Solution


ManEx is designed for EMS companies that traditionally do the outsourced work. However, there are ways to setup and track outside processing within ManEx.

Read the full ManEx Case Solution >>

IYOW In Your Own Words

Outsourcing Control 

"[They should]:

  • Structure the bills so that the thing going outside is a sub assembly. This provides a stocking point for the part preprocessed and another for it post process.
  • Inventory will show at the finished stage. If there is not enough stock available, and exception notice will exist and planning for the parts used in the sub-assembly will have already been planned via PWO's.
  • Issue an order for the finished version of this assembly to the supplier and shipped the unfinished units to them. When finished, they will be received back in stock against the subject purchase order.

"In this approach, everything is done within the system and the is inventory and purchasing records on all material."

-Wayne, OR   

"[We] made sub-assy boms [and] tagged the BUY items that need to go out for outsourcing as Inspection items so that when they are received...the initial person [is alerted]...the parts need to go back out for additional prep work. [We also changed] the item master description to say 'see I.M. notes', then...that entire notes tab to detail all the transactions that need to be done to get us usable raw material... I had to set the production offsets on the BOM so we got the raw material a little earlier than everything else.

"I believe my way works...however it's not exactly a 'clean' approach."

-Jay, MA   

 


MYMMake Your Mark

Please share your challenges and issues. Give us a challenge and see if we are able to provide a workable solution. All cases are presented using North Eastern Company (NE Company) as the principle in the case.

To suggest a new topic please send us an email or click here to submit the topic through our website.

 
 

©2008 All Rights Reserved.
ManEx Minute is a monthly email distributed by ManEx, Inc.
ManEx_Logo
Developing with YOU in mind!
1.1. Business Solution - 34 Outsourcing Management
Business Case Solution

Even outsourcing companies sometimes need to outsource.  This can be a cost effective way to complete a job when they do not have the resources or capabilities in-house.  However, three main actions are needed in order for it to work:


  1. Notify Purchasing - after MRP creates demand for the processed component, purchasing must be notified to not only order the raw material, but also the processing of the raw material into the finished component.

  2. Notify Inventory - once the raw material is in house, it must be sent for processing.  If there is a delay from initial receipt to shipping to the outsource provider it may delay the entire order.  If the same outsource company always processes the raw material, then this can be setup under the raw component so inventory knows where to send it.  Otherwise, purchasing must have a way to indicate which supplier will process the raw material for the specific order.

  3. Reflect Costs in Accounting - if the additional costs are not reflected in the final assembly, it will not be priced correctly and can make the entire job unprofitable.  Many companies forget this because the labor is not done in-house and the tracking is done outside of their system.  (There is some debate on how and where to record this additional expense.  Is it reflected in the labor or materials?  The preferred method, for most, is to record these costs as part of the material cost since it is purchased and not produced.  This is the same reason companies do not separate the labor costs to produce a capacitor under labor for the final assembly.  If desired, the labor required for tracking and managing the outsourcing may be recorded under labor costs for the top level.)

Many companies do not have an effective way of tracking these within their system and ensure that each step in the process is completed quickly and correctly. It is possible to manage this outside of any system, but doing so requires careful attention and an awareness of the potential pitfalls.

1.2. ManEx Solution - 34 - Outsource Management
ManEx Case Solution

ManEx is designed for EMS companies that traditionally do the outsourced work.  However, there are ways to setup and track outside processing within ManEx.  We suggest handling the three main actions as follows:

Notify Purchasing:

By creating a sub-assembly in ManEx for the processed component, users can accurately track costs and notification actions.  Because ManEx allows up to 512 levels on a BoM, users can make very complex sub-assemblies and still keep delivery commitments and costs.

The easiest way to notify buyers is to create an inventory part called "Outsource Labor" and put it as an item on the subassembly* to make the processed component.  This has several advantages, it allows MRP to automatically create the notification for buyers and they know how to process the "part", it allows accounting to capture this cost in the assembly (and include it in cost roll-ups), it allows receiving to have a part to receive once the processing is complete, it can be used on numerous assemblies as needed, and it allows users to account for both the raw and processed parts.

The sub-assembly approach will also ensure that the raw parts are delivered in plenty of time to allow for processing and still be included with the rest of the purchased components. This extra lead time is determined by value recorded under the processed component's production lead time in the item master.

*In order to purchase a part, it must be BUY or MAKE/BUY.  Buyers cannot order MAKE parts.  Additionally, BUY and MAKE/BUY parts cannot have other parts issued to them in kitting. This is why the processing is setup as a component on the processed part. Otherwise, users will not be able to automatically associate the costs of the raw component and processing with the processed component.

Notify Inventory

Parts that require outside processing can be marked to require incoming inspection.  This creates a flag for receiving so they can see what needs to happen next.  If the outsourcing is always done by the same supplier, users can add this information to the item master note as this is easily accessible from receiving.  Otherwise, buyers can indicate in the PO (either on the item or schedule notes) where the raw parts should be sent for processing.

If the part is always outsourced, it may be helpful to modify the part description to indicate this as well.  That will serve as another level of notification for receiving and inventory.

Another option is to create the WO for the processed part and change the kit status to "In Process" as soon as the raw material is ordered.  This will create a kit shortage for the raw part and allow receiving to "pull" the parts for the kit upon receiving.  Because they are needed for the "Out Sourced" work center (see the next section for details) receiving would know that it needs to be shipped for processing.

Reflect Costs in Accounting production Control

To keep an accurate picture of the value and location for raw and processed parts, the processed part bom should have a routing that includes a work center called "Out Sourced".  When inventory sends the raw parts out for processing, they can document this in the system by issuing them to the kit and transferring the qty to the "Out Sourced" work center.   Once the processing is complete, receiving will see that it is needed for the open work order already containing the raw parts.  The processing labor "part" can be issued to the kit and the "assembly" transfered to FGI.

The method will accurately reflect the cost, qty, and location for the raw parts and the processed parts (including the labor for processing).  It will create the notifications and action messages and help manufactures stay on top of their outsourced work.

contact a ManEx representative for more details on any of these topics.