1. ManEx Minute - 23 - Minimum Buys and Residual Inventory |
|
|
"Again gain is gain, however small."
-Robert Browning
|
|
|
May 13, 2009
Issue 23
Greetings!
We have started loading the lists of excess inventory into component exchange. I am excited for the pending BETA release. I hope to have screen shots and instructions ready very soon.
This issue of the newsletter focuses on handling minimum buys and residual inventory. It is a tough problem and one that many companies do not handle well. It is hard to find the balance between competitive pricing and profitability and minimum buys can often make the difference.
As always, we look forward to your participation and feedback as you gain new insights and become a more effective provider of Electronic Manufacturing Services.
Sincerely,
David Sharp
ManEx, Inc.
|
Business Case - Inventory Control
|
Residual Inventory
|
North Eastern Company (NE Company)* is finalizing a bid for a prospective customer launching a new product. The business has the potential of exceeding 40% of last year's sales. This customer has requested pricing on small to large volumes so they can ramp up production.
The customer will start with small orders. For those assemblies that go into high volume production, excess inventory is a non-issue. The inventory turn is high enough to minimize the impact of keeping extra parts on the shelf. However, any assemblies that do not go in to high volume production could potentially result in a significant inventory value sitting on the shelf.
Fortunately, many of the components are common among multiple customers and have high annual usage. These parts are not a concern. However, there are also several parts that are unique to the customer and that have high minimum order quantities and multiples.
At the time of the quotation, there is no way to know which assemblies will result in large production orders. NE Company wants to account for the minimum buys, but cannot simply roll it in to the quote as it would cause the pricing to be uncompetitive. They need some way to account for the extra parts and recoup the cost if they cannot use the parts in a reasonable time.
How can NE Company efficiently track inventory purchased for a job? How will they charge the customer for the parts not used? Is there a way for them to maintain visibility of the parts and make it easy to consume them if possible on other jobs?
*Name has been changed
|
Business Case Solutions
|
Component Pricing and Residual Inventory are critical factors in the contract manufacturing world...
|
ManEx Case Solution
|
ManEx is the best ERP system on the market for electronic contract manufacturers. No other system provides better control and more detail in component tracking than ManEx ERP...
Read the full ManEx Case Solution >>
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Purchases and Residual Inventory
"Because of the nature of our business, QTY and EAU decide the method.
"Decision on how to handle the cost is, relative to the customers business model. Can they provide EAU's? If so, we may sit on it or put it in one of our Suppliers in-house stores for their releases. If it is shared, than we wouldn't charge them. If it's a one time build, than we buy strips. If we cannot, than we charge them for the excess."
-Mike, AZ
"We charge customers for the excess parts qty. We then ship the parts to the customer. There is a period of time where we are holding the inventory on our books."
-Tom, OR
"[Using In-Store is] improving inventory turns."
-Mike, IL
|
|
Please share your ideas and insights on a topic below. Use the questions to direct your response. You can submit your thoughts to mym@manex.com by clicking the topic title. Where appropriate and space permitting, we will post responses in a future newsletter so all may benefit.
Tracking Components in Production
When you kit, do you kit by production work center?
Do you have separate bin for each work center?
Do you try to offset the components for later work centers to maximize cash flow?
How often do components end up in the wrong work center?
Do you track when you have pulled extra parts for a kit?
To suggest a new topic please send an email to mym@manex.com.
|
©2008 All Rights Reserved.
ManEx Minute is a bi-weekly email distributed by ManEx, Inc. |
Developing with YOU in mind! |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1. ManEx Solution - 23 - Minimum Buys and Residual Inventory |
Business Case Solution
Component Pricing and Residual Inventory are critical factors in the contract manufacturing world. The selected method of dealing with these issues can mean the difference between new business and not, or profit and loss.
Some of the most common methods for handling a situation like this are:
-
Quoting best price and sitting on the excess inventory - This method may win you the order, but can cost you the business. Excess inventory can quickly exceed order profits and while the order may be great business, it may reduce overall profitability as you try to consume or dispose of the inventory.
-
Quoting and purchasing actual quantities needed - This works well for small and proto-type runs. It reduces excess inventory and keeps record keeping simple. However, it requires extra work to source the parts, does not provide much attrition and scrap, and requires starting over for future orders.
-
Charging for the full reel - This ensures that all material is covered by the order and the customer is responsible for the cost. This also keeps internal inventory levels at the lowest possible level. However, it increases the unit price per assembly, which can cost you the business, and makes you responsible for managing the customer owned inventory.
-
Adding a lot charge for excess inventory - This method provides for the lowest possible price on the assembly, and identifies the value of inventory purchased in excess of demand. This also makes it easier to add flexibility to any contracts regarding how and when a customer would purchase the extra inventory. However, you must still have a way to track the inventory so that you know how much is still on hand in order to charge accordingly.
Companies may use any combination of the methods above depending on the customer, the situation, and the commonality of part.
|
1.2. ManEx Solution - 23 - Minimum Buys and REesidual Inventory |
ManEx Case Solution
ManEx is the best ERP system on the market for electronic contract manufacturers. No other system provides better control and more detail in component tracking than ManEx ERP. These features allow contract manufacturers to handle complex situations like the one described in the business case.
Users of ManEx are able to utilize any of the methods described in the business solution. Depending on the situation and circumstances, ManEx users can employ one of the following methods to accomplish their purposes:
-
Identifying Excess Inventory Values *- Quoting in ManEx allows users to see the value of inventory after production is complete. Providing this information to the customer in the quoting process enables everyone to plan for it from the start.
-
Track Customer Owned Inventory - Customers can provide their inventory where appropriate and ManEx will manage it throughout the process.
-
Track Inventory by Project *- Users are able to identify the project when purchasing inventory. This enables simple reporting of the current on-hand value for project inventory.
-
In-Store Inventory *- This can be used to track customer and supplier owned inventory for which the user will need to place an order upon consumption. Some companies use this to track components covered by excess inventory lot charges, but which remains the property of the user.
-
Standard and Custom Reports - Standard reports in ManEx will help users identify excess inventory for a given customer. Users can also create custom reports to further aid this process.
Case Solution
NE Company decided to provide visibility of the best pricing and potential excess inventory. They made the decision a collaborative effort. The customer agreed to either consume the excess inventory within six months or purchase the inventory and then sell it back as it is needed to fill the production runs.
Because they took a collaborative approach and had the ability to manage the inventory regardless of the owner and status, they were able to win the business and increase their sales and profits.
|
|