1. ManEx Minute - 332008 - MRP Sharing
 
Keep me out of SPAM!  Please add newsletter@manex.com to safe senders list.
 
 

In This Issue

Readers Poll

Poll Results

Which wave solder manufacturer(s) do you use?

wave solder survey results
 
 

INSPIRATIONS

"There are no big problems, there are just a lot of little problems."
-Henry Ford

 
 
 
 

 

Subscribe to ManEx Minute

Issue 332008  
Greetings,
 
Here it is, the first issue of the ManEx Minute Case Study Newsletter!
 
For this issue, we address communicating MRP demands with suppliers.  This is a common question we receive and a concern for nearly everyone in the industry.  Hopefully this issue will present ideas you hadn't considered and will help you make things more efficient.
 
We can't list every option available, but we try to cover the most common and useful.  However, if we missed one, please let us know and we will post the best ideas in the newsletter archive.
 
As always, We look forward to your participation and feedback as you gain new insights and become a more effective provider of Electronic Manufacturing Services.
 
Sincerely,
 
David Sharp
ManEx, Inc. 

Business Case - Material Requirements Planning 
Communicating MRP Demands  

As with most EMS companies, North Eastern Company* (N.E. Company) is working to maintain and grow the business while managing the peaks and valleys common to the industry.  This constant fluctuation makes planning a challenge.  How can they effectively satisfy demands in the peaks, without going bankrupt in the valleys?
 
Recently, N.E. Company has seen a significant increase in orders and frequency.  While these changes affect the entire company, the first impact is felt in purchasing.  These rapid changes make it difficult for buyers to effectively communicate with suppliers in a timely manner.  They either spend an inordinate amount of time updating suppliers on the frequent changes, or they miss some of the changes and have excess inventory, or component and production delays.
 
As work load increases, how are buyers supposed to maintain this communication while completing their other tasks?  And, how will changes impact performance and the bottom line during the next valley?
 
Management must either higher more buyers to stay on top of the frequent changes, and/or find a way to make their current staff more efficient.  But, what is the best way to do this, and what will it take?

Business Case Solutions
  1. More Resources - All too often, companies decide to throw more resources at the "temporary" problem further reducing their already tight profit margin. More people completing the purchasing process does NOT increase productivity and actually increases the likelihood of human error and production delays. While this might work for a little while, it is neither ideal, nor a viable long-term solution.

  2. EDI/XML - EDI and XML are communication methods allowing disparate systems to "talk" with each other.  Creating this connection between the systems can be very time consuming, especially if one or both systems does not have this capability built-in.  However, if the volume is high enough and the relationship will last long enough, this type of communication is an effective way to allow the different systems to communicate reducing the work load and opportunities for error.

  3. Remote Access - For the most trusted suppliers, giving them direct access to specific parts of the system may be the simplest way to give them visibility of changes in upcoming demand.  However, special care should be taken to ensure that they only have read-only access to specific sections.  Make sure your system will allow this type of user control before granting access.

  4. Automated Status Updates - This is a fairly broad option because the method of execution can vary widely from company to company and from system to system.  However, any method that would easily allow the system to automatically update each supplier (regardless of EDI/XML capabilities) would qualify.  This can be as easy as periodic emails generated by the system or reports suppliers can run at their convenience.  Regardless of the method, buyers no longer have to manage each and every part number to ensure it will be delivered according to demands and can instead focus on exceptions and non-standard parts. 

* Company name has been changed.

ManEx Case Solution


Make
YOUR Mark

Here is a list of upcoming topics.  Please email your thoughts, comments, and suggestions to mym@manex.com

  1. Managing Vendor/Customer Owned Inventory
  2. Lot Tracing
  3. Obsolescence of Manufacturer Part Numbers
  4. Production Offsets
  5. Comprehensive AVL Management

If you have any topics you would like to see addresses in future newsletters, please send them to topics@manex.com.

©2008 All Rights Reserved.
ManEx Minute is a weekly email distributed by ManEx, Inc.

ManEx_Logo

Developing with YOU in mind! 

1.1. ManEx Solution - 332008 - MRP Sharing



ManEx Case Solution
 

Although most methods mentioned in ManEx Minute can be utilized with ManEx, one of the most common is Automated Status Updates using a custom trigger or report.  

The steps to use a custom trigger are outlined below:

  1. Create a Buyer to represent the preferred supplier
  2. Assign Buyer to components handled by the supplier
  3. Create a new trigger
  4. Enter the SQL statement that filters MRP demand by the Buyer
  5. Enter/Select email recipients
  6. Specify frequency
  7. Mark Trigger as Active.

This allows the user to filter MRP by the specific supplier and allows for easier communication with that supplier regarding the select group of part numbers.